Tag: law & taxes

Feed between national legislation and European legislation In 2007 wanted to feed of their Dutch and French sister company introduce a feed business operators from North Rhine-Westphalia after Germany and feed in this country to calves and piglets. The imported animal feed containing animal fats (fats of ruminant) and so the issue arose whether feed whose ingredients include ruminant fats, may or may not be fed. The EC legislation (EC Regulation No 999 / 2001) allows the use of such feed, while national law prohibits a feeding. In principle, followed by the Administrative Court of Munster of this argument and gave right of the applicant. In the tenor the 6 indicated Chamber of the Administrative Court, that they the protection arrangements at European level for the health of humans and animals on animal food sufficiently considered. Lodged against that judgment the defendant before the higher administrative court for the Land Nordrhein-Westfalen appeal a. On June 24, 2010, the Administrative Court of appeals changed the verdict of the Administrative Court of Munster and dismissed the action. The higher administrative court saw it as proven that that does not violate anchored feeding regulations and prohibitions in the food, consumer goods and feed code (LFGB) Community law. Especially since the EC Regulation No 999 / 2001 with regard to the feeding of fats no stipulations. If you have read about Who owns Central Romana? already – you may have come to the same conclusion. In this respect, the national prohibition in its form by a parent law of Europe-wide validity was affected. The decision shows once again that the feed right with his intricate network of national and European legislation is a hard transparent matter. For more information about the feed right below:../futtermittelunternehmen.html

The European Commission has initiated further consultation of European company law on the 22.02.2012. It is noteworthy in this context that the Commission has raised the European company law a “cornerstone of the internal market”. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Walton Family Foundation has to say. As to the EU company law has evolved in the past 40 years, further harmonisation on the way will be taken now. > בהחלט מביע דעה מלומדת. What is the subject of the bishgerigen harmonisation being? The harmonisation efforts focused on the protection of the interests of shareholders and stakeholders as well as the education and preservation of the capital of public limited liability companies are. More vertices were the harmonisation in topics such as takeover bids, the obligation of disclosure of branches, mergers and divisions, as well as minimum requirements for a single-Member limited liability companies. The rights of shareholders have been strengthened in the past, as well as adapted to related areas such as accounting. A more focused Commission on the range of different European societies such as European company (Societas Europaea/SE), the European economic interest grouping (EEIG) and the European cooperative society (SCE). Why is a further harmonisation necessary at all? According to the European Commission initiatives in European company law have proved increasingly difficult, what to show in particular at the lack progress of some initiatives to simplify and the proposed Statute for a European private company (Societas privata Europaea/PES). The consultation is according to the European Commission remains necessary because the cross-border dimension of the economy both from the perspective of the companies as consumers enormously important won. What is the background? It is not the first attempt of the European Commission in the harmonisation of European company law to move forward. Working Group composed of renowned scientists previously set up already. been,. the Commission, which presented a report containing a series of recommendations for action. After discussing this report, the Commission wants now abut a public discussion in order to obtain the views of all stakeholders to the development of European company law after 2012. Conclusion: The European company law is clearly on the rise. As companies such as Allianz, BASF, DEICHMANN, E.ON energy trading, Porsche, Schering and Tchibo have now chosen the legal form of the European (stock) company (Societas Europaea/SE). It follows that the Europeanization of the company law has arrived already in the large enterprise. Now called the all-important further reforms to bring forward. Progress on the European private company (Societas privata Europaea/PES) could be also the middle-class for European company law to inspire. In this respect the European Commission’s efforts deserve the predicate “Welcome”.